[Note: This comment comes from friend Doc Searls. DLH]
From: Doc Searls <dsearls@cyber.law.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Dewayne-Net] Welcome to hell: Apple vs Google vs Facebook and the slow death of the web
Date: September 18, 2015 at 01:44:24 EDT
To: dewayne@warpspeed.com
Dewayne,
I’ve been writing about ad and tracking blocking for the last month an a half.
My latest, at the bottom, speaks directly to the market-hostile anti-adblock mentality from which Patel and others in the tracking-based advertising world (which includes publishers like The Verge) come from. I’d respond to it directly if I had time, but I’m in wall-to-wall meetings here in Prague.
Doc
1) Separating advertising’s wheat and chaff
<http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2015/08/12/separating-advertisings-wheat-and-chaff/>
2) Apple’s content blocking is chemo for the cancer of adtech
<http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2015/08/26/apples-content-blocking-is-chemo-for-the-cancer-of-adtech/>
3) Will content blocking push Apple into advertising’s wheat business?
<http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2015/08/29/will-content-blocking-push-apple-into-advertisings-wheat-business/>
4) Debugging adtech assumptions
<http://liveblog.co/users/dsearls/2015/09/11/tweetline.html>
5) If marketing listened to markets, they’d hear what ad blocking is telling them.
<http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2015/09/08/if-marketing-listened-to-markets-theyd-hear-what-ad-blocking-is-telling-them/>
Welcome to hell: Apple vs Google vs Facebook and the slow death of the web
By Nilay Patel
Sep 17 2015
<
>